Fighting copyright monopolies is hard enough without adding Stockholm syndrome to the mix.
Why are you fighting copyright monopolies? You are doing free work for the any-copyright industry.
edit: ok, that's not true. the MPAA/RIAA advertisements do equate piracy with violent crime.
Good journalism boosts the quality of civic life. Journalism funded solely by advertising has a poor record. So we're left with public funding à la the BBC, or the patronage of billionaires, thereby sacrificing the Fourth Estate's independence; or subscriptions. The latter requires a solution to the free rider problem [1]. Paywalls, and the copyrights defending them, are one such solution.
I consume news from subscription sources (e.g. the Wall Street Journal and the Information), advertising-back sources (e.g. Politico) and subsidized sources (e.g. the BBC and Bloomberg). I benefit from that reading, as does, I believe, the greater society I live in. I think it's fair and rational to fight for said journalists' compensation.
Or, I am curious why the OP is willing to take this risk for us.
Really, though, I am just curious if I would get in trouble for doing the same down the line ;)
It's not "Stockholm syndrome" it's being decent and respectful of other people's effort and work.
