undefined | Better HN

0 pointswellpast8y ago0 comments

Words and vocabulary aren’t enough. Not the colloquial/dictionary sense, at least.

So if we’re talking about “facts” in an “ontology” — these are still (they must be if they are going to be processed by a machine) concrete formalisms - that’s what I mean by algebras.

If we are not machine-processing these ontologies but just printing them out for users, then I don’t count that. Because we’re not really programming over those abstractions. We’re just giving them back to the humans.

0 comments

seanmcdirmid8y ago

Instructing someone how to do something and the computer how to do it is basically the same thing. Yes, humans have more latitude in how they follow instructions, but the same skills ofnabsteaction are applied. The whole point about OOP is that you could still weild abstractions without being a mathematician.

Now, how often do people learn chess algebraically?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointswellpast8y ago0 comments

Words and vocabulary aren’t enough. Not the colloquial/dictionary sense, at least.

So if we’re talking about “facts” in an “ontology” — these are still (they must be if they are going to be processed by a machine) concrete formalisms - that’s what I mean by algebras.

0 comments

seanmcdirmid8y ago

Now, how often do people learn chess algebraically?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse