Same code in F# (one line, of course!)
let currentNetTypes = System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies() |>
Seq.filter(fun x->x.FullName.Contains("Version=4.0.0.0")) |>
Seq.map(fun x->x.GetExportedTypes()) |> Seq.concat |>
Seq.sortBy(fun x->x.Name.Length);;
To me this reads easier, but I admit to a biased opinion :) var currentNetTypes = from a in System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
from y in a.GetExportedTypes()
where a.FullName.Contains("Version=4.0.0.0")
orderby y.Name.Length
select y;
Or possibly: var currentNetTypes = from a in System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
.Where(x => x.FullName.Contains("Version=4.0.0.0"))
from y in a.GetExportedTypes()
orderby y.Name.Length
select y; Seq.map ($GetExportedTypes()) |> Seq.sortBy $x.Name.Length
Where $ is some special syntax to indicate "generate a function that uses its parameter as the this parameter for the instance call". I think this has been brought up but perhaps a nice syntax hasn't been found? def foo(x) { x + 5 }
fun(x) { x + 5}
(x) => x + 5
lambda x -> x + 5
_ + 5
I find I miss the _ syntax more than most syntactical sugar. I don't know how often I have to write things like lambda x: x.foo in Python, where _.foo would serve the same purpose. currentNetTypes = sorted(
sum(
list(asm.getExportedTypes())
for asm in System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
if 'Version=4.0.0.0' in asm.FullName),
lambda a, b: cmp(len(a.Name), len(b.Name))
)
Clean, but I love how the |> operator in F# serves to flatten code like this.