It's sort of like how the IFPI used the "profitable" motive in it's arguments against the Pirate Bay.
Poor people make poor lawsuit targets.
http://www.homethinking.com/brontemedia/2009/02/22/4chanorg-...
The revenue is enough to cover the hosting plus maybe a few hundreds extra. That's all.
But seriously, not being commercially driven is what gives the chans their credibility. Commercializing that crowd is a million dollar question. Now that moot has taken VC, it will be interesting to see how his new project will monetize.
Via Wikipedia, two articles from the time on SA's monetization woes pre-forum-fees:
http://lowendmac.com/musings/express.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20020202083639/http://www.theduke...