undefined | Better HN

0 pointsCalChris8y ago0 comments

The appellees tried to use the 10th and the Court said no and then further said the 10th is basically a legal truism.

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

Sorry, by "legal truism" you mean inherently enforceable because it is reinforcing a point that is taken to be true without any sort of countermand?

Your statement seems self-contradictory.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse