Come on, you are really simplifying. That argument was used in London at the beginning of the XIX century. We all know now it is flawed.

> Every single person who has a job with Amazon is there because they choose to be.

That's not necessarily the case in the UK where people claiming unemployment benefits are compelled to spend 35 hours a week searching and applying for jobs.

Someone in that regime may well have applied to work at Amazon because they would have had a benefit sanction otherwise.

When the alternative is destitution, homelessness, and starvation the choice to work in a hellish occupation can hardly be called 'voluntary'. Many who find themselves in a situation where a job in one of these hellholes is an attractive proposition are in those types of desperate life circumstances.

The same way we fight against sexual harassment we can just raise the standard for everyone.