[1]: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/well/move/for-your-brains...
https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/which-type-of-exer...
https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/07/13/can-running-make-y...
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/well/move/jogging-the-bra...
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/14/well/move/running-as-the-...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/30/well/move/moving-when-you...
Obviously, that is my experience. Ymmv
Point is, I ended up getting into bouldering. If you want to send a bouldering problem, you have to spend a while actually planning out your movements, because if you waste time trying to figure out your next move in the middle of all but the easiest problems, you'll run out of energy before completing the problem. Like lifting, you need rest time between climbs, but you can spend that time planning out your next attempt. Only downside is that indoor bouldering walls tend to be crowded most of the time, and outdoor bouldering can require a bit of a drive depending on where you live.
Still, I find it a lot more stimulating than lifting; I actually look forward to bouldering, while lifting still felt like a chore even after 8 months of doing it.
edit: I should add that I've only been bouldering regularly for about 2 months, and mostly at an indoor gym.
You are clearly very unimaginative when it comes to exercise. I find the gym pretty bloody boring. But whitewater kayaking, mountain biking, rock climbing easily beat sitting in front of a computer. If those are too much go for a hike in the mountains and take in some scenery. Or learn to surf.
Or cycle to work. I get an hours solid exercise every day doing that and save myself time and money as a result.
I regularly spend 2-4hrs on a road bike and I've never found it boring and I have a low boredom threshold generally (outside of programming).
It's just a case of finding your niche.
"Thrill Of The Fight", "Holopoint", "GORN" or similar games are a lot of fun and are at least a moderate workout. I've literally just finished a half-hour session of GORN, I'm fairly sweaty, and I wasn't bored once.
(I also recommend similar things in IRL with Actual People, but I'm aware that those tend to be both more intimidating and harder to fit into a pre-set schedule.)
Now I run outside for sometimes five times as long as I was running back then, without podcasts or TV shows, and I never get bored. I do run slower, though. Try going slower next time! And going outside in a straight line or long loop. I get very bored/frustrated if I have to do laps to make my distance. Of course YMMV too.
Apart from the gym, I play soccer three times a week and it is nothing by fun. Switching volleyball session during the winter.
One of the best things I did both for my health and productivity was exercising + sports.
Is my posture correct? Are my feet hitting the ground well? Is this a good pace? And lots and lots of self talk about not shirking the next effort (30s hard running, hill run etc etc).
I do my best thinking while running, and make use of it to solve problems, write articles, etc.
Lifting weights, however, remains painful and boring :-( and I think that is because it requires mental focus. Running does not, you can just drift off into something that interests you.
You can also get your exercise from exciting activities like sports or Dance Dance Revolution (but your experience may vary!).
Plus there's the whole creativity thing when the mind is at rest.
Yep. So listen to podcasts during. Seminars About Long Term Thinking and In Our Time being my favorites.
Boring, because you frequently have to do something in addition to exercising to make the time spent exercising interesting. See the myriad of sibling comments.
Painful, because my exercise as a youth (competitive swimming) badly damaged most of my major joints, making anything but the lightest of impact workouts painful (which leads, sadly, back to point 1).
Pros
My attention got better, I was less easily distracted.
My executive function was better, I made better choices in life.(less junk food, fewer beers)
My thoughts slipped less often, I had those "what was I just talking about" moments less and less frequently.
Cons
Sometimes I felt overly focused for social situations. Like the feeling you get when you've been studying for 4 hours, and then try to the shoot the shit with someone, and you end up being too rigid/serious and instead of playful/fun.
Nowadays, I could study for a couple of hours before going for a short break. I know that some of you don't think that's good enough but for someone who used to struggle with procrastination and being "easily distracted", I am happy with the result.
I doubt the subtle differences between different dual-n-back matter.
Charisma doesn't come from the liver. (believe that was Yudkowsky)
But it is good to hear that it worked well for you
* for context, he's got a lot on his site about n-back:
The article claims the failure of previous brain-training studies came from choosing the wrong techniques, but the evidence on dual n-back specifically has been conflicted for quite a while; this isn't the first study on it.
What's interesting here is that a lot of the best results on dual n-back in the past have concluded that it's mostly promising to fight cognitive decline or boost recovery. Previous work on boosting memory in young, mentally-healthy people has come up with basically nothing.
I'm hoping that this is the better and more-powerful study, and that n-back does boost general working memory. But the cynic in me is wondering if the chosen working-memory metric was simply more vulnerable to training effects from n-back than from complex span.
It didn't seem like a great distinction to me, but maybe it eliminates control issues when comparing two studies of different techniques vs comparing two different techniques in one study.
Eventually, someone decides it's time to start popping backward through the stack. They respond with the same word that they were just passed and the group tries to remember the right words to continue popping back down the stack, one person and word at a time. This gets harder "near the bottom" of the stack because it's been longer since those words were spoken.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820261/
This meta analysis says there's a small affect
https://www.google.com.pe/amp/s/m.mic.com/articles/amp/89363...
(i do play drums, synth, and guitar.)
Drumming, in a band context, is all about remembering certain drum patters, combinating them mentally so they fit the music as well as possible, and then playing them with perfect timing...
... all of this in real time, and as an endless while(song is not over) loop!!
>And who's gonna tell you if you got it right or wrong?
You don't want to make the bassist, the singer, the guitar player, and the keyboard player all get angry at you at the same time for making the group sound bad!
Lately, I've felt my memory has been a little off. I feel like I'm not remembering things I would normally easily remember.
Like the other day, I was trying to remember what they speak in Iran (Farsi) or who the head coach of the Boston Celtics or what was the name of the Scorsese movie with Wahlberg/Damon/Nicholson. These are all subjects I'm very familiar with so it bothered me that I couldn't remember the answers immediately.
http://brainscale.net/dual-n-back
Also, if you feel like working off of someone else's source:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/brainworkshop/files/brainwo...
Though it seems relatively simple to design.
His 2004 TED Talk[2] on neuroplasticity is IMHO well worth watching.
[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Merzenich
[2]: https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_merzenich_on_the_elastic_b...
I get that they got increased brain activity in areas associated with learning and memory, but I'd like to see subjects also improve when directly tested.