> Source?
https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/facebook-mobile-app-...
Over 50% of facebook users only access it from their mobile devices.
> And I do not think, there is a sharp line between WebApp and Website. You could say, we are using one right now (even though very primitive) discussing right now - more than "static(-ish) content"
You could make that claim but it'd be a tough sell. Sites like this are clearly not what anyone talks about when they say "web app" or extol the virtues of HTML5. This site is static(-ish) content with hyperlinks to go to new static pages. It's not dynamic or highly interactive. Which is part of what makes it great, don't get me wrong. But it's clearly not a candidate for a web app, it's not clamoring for webasm, webgl, or any of those shiny new toys, etc...
> the web is faaaar away from static documents linking each other, what was it's origin.
How do you figure? Most people google something (either via a dumb web form or more commonly via a native app), then click a link to a static page.
Or this site, which is basically just an index page of yesteryear, and is literally just a bunch of static links to other usually static content.
> And with real webapps - well, I believe the big ones are about to come. The underlying technology to really make them usefull, is just about to become stable.
I disagree since the underlying technology really truly doesn't exist. The fundamental basics to making a responsive app still don't exist at all (no cheap concurrency, for example, to say nothing of cheap parallelism).
