undefined | Better HN

0 pointscsomar8y ago0 comments

Please no ad-hominem. You should only discuss his article in question.

0 comments

That is not what ad-hominem means. When you are evaluating the reliability of a source, it is perfectly legitimate to look at what that source has produced in the past and see if it holds up.

hwillis8y ago

He's condemning the author's work, not the author.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

Analemma_8y ago

That is not what ad-hominem means. When you are evaluating the reliability of a source, it is perfectly legitimate to look at what that source has produced in the past and see if it holds up.

hwillis8y ago

He's condemning the author's work, not the author.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse