> I really don't know what you mean by this.
You've answered to Apple copying others with "it was an obvious step forward, just infeasible before". Which fails to explain why was it infeasible for Apple until after it became feasible for others.
> I feel like you're trying to accuse me of saying that nobody but Apple is capable of innovation, which is nonsense.
It is a strong predictor of how you responded to the examples that were raised. The obvious question after seeing that is "is there a counterexample?"
