People who didn't pay the "taxes" were evicted and their possessions given to loyalists; sounds a lot like renting.
The core of the issue really was that Britain defended the American colonies from French invasion during the Seven Year's War and the British taxpayer bore the brunt of the taxation (I can't remember exact figures, but Britons were taxed much, much heavier than Americans, even after the stamp duties and tea taxes). After the war, Parliament came looking for payback, understandably. So Britain wasn't using taxation to control the colonies, it was looking to recoup the costs of defending them.
On a sidenote, this is actually quite interesting in today's context over NATO military spending, where now it is Britain freeloading on American military spending.
My argument wasn't sound - I'm glad you provided historically accurate facts that were both enjoyable and informative!
Your sidenote is also interesting - and on another note (albeit silly) - have you heard of the AMC drama TURN: Washington's Spies? I've started watching it and have quite enjoyed it so far.
This is an entirely legitimate statement.
> ...now it is Britain freeloading on American military spending.
...but this you're really going to have to back up. Can you point to a specific example and explain why it's 'freeloading'?
No? Don't pay your property tax. See how fast you get evicted from that home you "own" by the sheriff.
