Private corporations and government are different, legally and philosophically. You won't be able to apply a law written specifically restricting the government to private citizens or corporations without a constitutional amendment.

What Google and GoDaddy did was the private citizen equivalent of hearing someone else state their opinion, allowing the words to enter their brain, think about them, and then decide they do not espouse those opinions, so they will not go around stating them to other people as fact. That is not censorship, it's just good sense.

Whether or not Google and Godaddy's actions are appropriate is a separate discussion from whether or not the government can compel political websites to disclose their visitor logs.

> What Google and go daddy did is tantamount to censorship

It is censorship (not “tantamount”), but censorship of the sort (private actors deciding on what views to promote with their own resources) that the idea of “free speech” in general, and the First Amendment in particular, exist to protect.

They did what they thought it's best for their platforms

It's theirs, Google and Godaddy are not public libraries.

I can't stop you from screaming pro Nazi propaganda on the streets

But if you do it in my home, I kick you out.

Simple as that