Very much not just a southern thing.
There is a huge amount of cheap, cookie-cutter housing in American suburbia. In fact, I suspect a large majority of single family suburban houses built in the last 50 years are rubber stamp clones from homebuilder planbooks.
[0]: http://www.archdaily.com/604056/north-america-s-radiant-city...
The current alternative that US prefers is far worse, in my opinion -- these micro-unit apod-ment things, with no personal space, no outdoor space, grossly overburdened personal-areas-forced-into-common-areas, and general dorm-room-for-life lifestyle.
So in America where you have the same McMansion replicated 10-20 times in CHcina you have the same condo tower since it has to house more densely.
You should visit the projects in the NY area or chicago. There are rows and rows of same red apartment complexes. But those seem to be falling out of favor now as they are being torn down.
That line caught my attention for two things.
One, it intimates internet access is related to freedom, which I think has merit.
And second, Google, Facebook, and YouTube are obviously not essential, cause those millions get by just fine without them.
What's more, in parts of China where these websites aren't blocked (Hong Kong, Taiwan if we call it a part of China), they become very popular again and the mainland Chinese alternatives fall off the map.
This is why such sites without real alternatives should be controlled by society, and not by companies where two people hold the majority of voting rights.
I can also give the example of Japan and Korea in which Facebook is not very popular.
Most of foreigners traveling in China would certainly disagree with you. No Facebook, no Gmail, no Youtube == "no Internet" for most casual western users.
*Shenzhen