> Quite a few valid questions and thoughts too
all of which are "merely" implementation details and polish. The analogy is that you've built a crude engine that can sit on a box in an axel to move rather than using an animal, but the nay-sayers ask how do you deal with the bad weather/water, and how do you brake and turn smoothly?
The idea is fundamentally good, and it takes someone with vision to see through the smog of implementation details and problems.