undefined | Better HN

0 pointsDrScump9y ago0 comments

Unless a company is shutting down, the first to be laid off are (or are perceived to be by upper management) "poor performers".

0 comments

4 comments · 2 top-level

adamstober9y ago· 2 in thread

Would love to learn from data if you have any to back that up. From what we've seen, top reasons that determine who gets laid off include those who: 1) get paid well (the layoff is a desperate cost-cutting measure) 2) are randomly selected (the company is acknowledging that layoffs are not performance-related) 3) either got hired most recently or have most tenure (an attempt to reward longtime employees or respect those who just joined)

adamstober9y ago

There's also the "entire department" (often post-acquisition) rationale. In any case, your perception is pretty common, and that creates a hiring opportunity for savvy recruiters who know better and don't pre-judge.

adamstober8y ago

Here's today's example of an "entire department" layoff at SoundCloud: https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/06/soundcloud-the-youtube-for...

wayn39y ago

the first to be laid off usually are local maxima - senior engineers who pull way more than their own weight but appear "expensive" due to seniority.

the first round of layoffs so often cripples a company because they make cuts on the wrong end of the performance spectrum.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse