Apple's move, however, will force the carriers to compete for the business of customers with unlocked iPhones, possibly even on a monthly basis.
I don't buy that somehow. They are pretty expensive (at least here anyway) compared to the currently subsidized prices. Currently I see no real benefit of not getting a contract device for 18 months then getting the free upgrade.
Customers will only need to buy a Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) or micro-SIM, which typically sell for about $10, to switch to a different carrier.
What about data costs? I know you couldn't do that here because internet access costs would crucify you quickly.
It was something like $2500 total over 24 months, vs. $1700 when buying it outright and going on a cheaper contract.
You'd think more people could do basic math and think past the "first hit is $99" bait-and-switch...
Also: Vodafone in NZ does not do free upgrades for contract users, begging the question of the point of a contract.
I don’t know much about the price structure in the US but in Germany there are cheaper options if you buy just the SIM. That phone must be payed somehow, that’s why you pay more every month when you have a subsidized phone.
Now, that in itself wouldn’t be so bad, but your choices are seriously limited with a iPhone. What if I don’t need hundreds of minutes but want a real data flat rate? That’s not possible with an iPhone.
And you can’t just pop in some cheapo prepaid SIM when traveling, you are forced to shoulder the roaming costs. That’s maybe not so important in the US but seriously sucks in Europe.
Since the costs are the same – either higher monthly costs and a subsidized phone or lower monthly costs and a unsubsidized phone – I would always rather buy the unsubsidized phone.
Wow, yeh. I just checked into this and it seems in the UK, on O2, we get a great deal - basically "free internet" data for a 18 months (then you can get a free upgrade).
Since the costs are the same
Not sure that's true, depending on your needs. The unsubsidized phone + lower monthly cost + phone bill would be much larger for me than the current contract I have.
Agreed, though, it would be nice to be able to pop in a foreign SIM when abroad (I actually have a SIM free bog standard phone for this exact reason)
No. They've been doing this for a while. Not sure why it's news now.
Especially for the folks who haven't been following the situation all along and/or live in very different parts of the world.
For comparison: here in Russia 3GS now officially costs $961/1122 (29990/34990 RUB) for 16/32 GB. It launched in March [sic] I doubt that they will sell any significant amount; seems like a dead end for the operators.
I know that a lot of people, here in particularl, find the notion of locked down hardware repugnant, but from a cost/benefit perspective, I have just not seen that much of a problem, personally. I mean, are there usage scenarios with an assumption that you will have continuous approximate service (for the purposes of the iPhone, that would be a voice and data plan) that are common where carrier lock-in is very costly?
Extrapolated over 2 years: ~€610. (+ €60 for the second phone if you must include it)
The best iPhone tariff at the time was €35/month for 2 years - €840.
Added bonuses:
- I don't have to pay exorbitant data roaming charges when abroad, as I can just swap in a local SIM and have done so in South Africa, UK and Spain. (this is the reason I use a separate SIM+phone for voice)
- iPhone is exclusive to Orange & T-Mobile in Austria, the 2 worst networks for 3G. (this isn't much of an issue as "worst" here is still pretty good compared to most countries)
- ability to resell or otherwise pass it on (obviously)
- I can freely move country (it happens)
- I can tariff-hop
This isn't strictly a comparison of the same phone with a contract and without, since it's compared to the nexus one without a contract, but a more detailed search will turn up some (some have been posted here on hacker news).
Other than what's outlined in that comparison, what other benefits are you thinking of? It mainly comes down to price, and often the total cost to the consumer over the length of the contract is more when the phone is subsidized vs when there is no contract. There's a perception that the the subsidized price is cheaper (just like how government subsidized student loans are cheaper because the government initially "pays" the interest), but I think often the phone is just being paid for in installments in each monthly bill during the contract.
However, I'll freely admit that I don't necessarily have data or experience to back this up. Am I on the right track here, or babbling aimlessly?
- all the major carriers support the iPhone
- Apple is selling unlocked phones
- you can get a voice/data plan without a contract if you have an unlocked phone
- phone number portability works well
I think it's possible to get unlocked Blackberry and Android phones too, but not sure. It's too early to tell if this will lead to lower prices and better service, but I'm optimistic.I bought an unlocked iPhone 3GS in January and paid a premium, but I will probably sell it this summer, if I can get an unlocked iPhone 4G.
Although I'm guessing there's still some carrier subsidy hidden in that price since commitment free != unlocked, and even if that phone is sold on eBay it's guaranteed to only generate revenue for AT&T and nobody else.
Despite how it sounds, this isn't anything new. They've been doing this for some time.
Edit: I should point out, I believe we also got the iPhone care thingy from Apple as well. Which makes more sense.
Wind Mobile works off a different spectrum so that doesn't help. Rogers, Telus, and Bell all have almost the exact same plans for the iPhone and if you don't buy the iPhone from them the monthly cost is usually higher not cheaper.