undefined | Better HN

0 pointspaulmd9y ago0 comments

No, in gaming it's literally twice the power consumption of a GTX 1060.

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Sapphire/RX_580_Nitro_Pl...

Many other aftermarket 580s are similar. For a sense of perspective here, that's roughly the same amount of power as some aftermarket 290Xs used. Or roughly 60 watts more than a GTX 1080. And that's GPU-only, not a total system load.

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/R9_290X_Direct_Cu_I...

Polaris 10 is a reasonably efficient chip when you don't push it too hard. AMD - and their AIB partners - are pushing it way, way too hard in a desperate attempt to eke out a 2% win over the 1060. It isn't worth a 50% increase in TDP to get an extra 8% performance.

(and unlike the RX 480 - there is no reference RX 580 design, it's a whole bunch of these crazy juiced-up cards)

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

tutanchamun9y ago

Reference card (1060) vs overlocked card (580). Looking at multiple review sites, including international ones like Computerbase, PCGH.de etc, and comparing overlocked 1060 vs overclocked 480/580 the difference is ~50-60 watt.

Not good, but also not twice the power consumption...

I don't understand why AMD didn't use faster memory in the 580 like Nvidia did with the 1060 refresh. The 580 needs faster memory more than higher core clocks.

Lets hope AMDs return to tile based rendering (used in Adreno) plus the other improvements help them get better at power consumption just like Nvidia with Maxwell. But I don't expect much from Vega after AMDs GPUs of the last 3 years. Navi looks more promising, as it is probably the first GPU to be fully designed under Raja Koduri.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse