Just let me know!
It seems like it's early days for Voyage. How do you see your service eventually getting to market?
Autonomous software development might finish 90% of the technical challenge, only to discover 90% remains to encode legal and insurance precepts before mass adoption is allowed because the safety outcomes bar to clear for autonomous driving will be higher than manual driving. Once you reach edge cases where the only physically-available options are all bad outcomes (where either riders get hurt, or people outside the riders get hurt), until sensor and simulation technology get good enough to evaluate the degree of how much each party gets hurt to discover the minimal injury option, we might be forced to make do with developing software that chooses an option that presents the least risk exposure to legal and insurance liabilities according to the governing jurisdiction. If so, then that would be a real mess to wrangle.
Hopefully, legal, insurance and regulatory frameworks around the world will recognize in autonomous vehicles with LIDAR+radar+sonar+vision+sound sensors, with the kind of testing the big players are performing, mortality per million miles driven are bound to be lower than human drivers, and not engage in a perfect-enemy-of-good position.
If politically-influential stakeholders put up barriers to entry in the form of demanding better-than-human perfection in outcomes, then we could wait a long time as players switch to alternative go-to-market plans. One possibility might be embed the sensor and software technology into manually-controlled cars as accident mitigation features, but simultaneously collect massive amounts of data to refine the edge case handling characteristics, and gradually ease into self-driving.
Retrofitting is such a tough industry to be in. Every car is ridiculously different.