> How? A competitor is obligated by capitalism to do everything they can to level the competition. An accusation doesn't make fact.

There's no principle in capitalism, nor law, that would require(!) you to level false criminal accusations against competitors. The opposite is true. If Google's case were found to be entirely without merit, and intentionally so, they'd be liable for criminal prosecution themselves.

Even the whole you-must-everyting-to-increase-shareholder-value-shtick is mostly a myth, by the way(mo).

> An accusation doesn't make fact.

An accusation with even a tiny bit of evidence supporting it can rightly be the basis of a conclusion of fact when the standard (as is generally the case in civil court) is preponderance of the evidence, and no evidence is presented on the other side.