undefined | Better HN

0 pointstomp9y ago0 comments

As opposed to CNN, WaPo, Bremain and Clinton's campaign?!

0 comments

4 comments · 2 top-level

facetube9y ago· 2 in thread

Which one of those runs stories that argue against observed scientific fact? Which one of those repeatedly stokes religious intolerance and anti-immigrant sentiments, to the detriment of a nation built on immigration and tolerance? There is no moral equivalence here.

FeatureRush9y ago

Coming from Poland, where recently we struggle with news authenticity it took me less than 60 seconds to finds this:

www.cnn.com/2017/02/23/world/pope-atheists-again/

> Pope: It's better to be an atheist than a bad Christian - CNN.com

How this is not a fake news and misrepresentation of what the Pope have said? It's so bad that the story was removed from HN and even pro-atheist reddit didn't bough it...

literallycancer9y ago

The title is usually chosen by someone else than the author of the article. Other than the clickbait title, the article seems fairly normal?

1 more reply

mcintyre19949y ago

Wait, where's the link between the remain campaign and Clinton's campaign? Did US news sites even care much about Brexit? Also AFAIK there's no monetary or commercial relationship between the UK government and any non-BBC domestic or foreign news network - am I wrong?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse