Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
appleflaxen
9y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
Apple seems like a good example of where someone made a proprietary fork of a non-left license, and made only trivial contributions back.
0 comments
2 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
gsnedders
9y ago
· 1 in thread
NeXT's usage of BSD predates BSD being available under
any
open source license, and as such macOS/iOS's use of it seems like a direct consequence of that rather than it being under a non-left license.
appleflaxen
OP
9y ago
I don't understand why the license at the time is relevant. The point is that if it had been copyleft, they would be required to contribute back.
It wasn't, so they weren't and didn't.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse