You're apparently assuming people not from these minority religions aren't being murdered for some inane reason. How about prioritising people who are getting murdered regardless of the underlying reason?
> Would you, during WW2, say no to Jews, because it would be a 'religious test'?
Apparently you would, during WW2, say no to 7th day adventists, gays or socialists.
Incidentally your invocation of Jews in WWII is interesting given the administration's all-live-matter-ing of these exact same WWII jews on Remembrance Day, confirmed to have been intentional.
> What would be worse, having a religious test or being driven to extinction?
How about neither and judging each and every application instead of applying nonsensical blanket bans?
