undefined | Better HN

0 pointsJeremyBanks9y ago0 comments

Arch is the oddball. I'm not aware of anybody else who's made the switch.

Given that they're not mutually compatible except in rare cases, it's a very silly thing to do. You can upgrade GCC with the same name because you know it will handle most of the same input. If you do that with Python you're breaking tons of existing scripts for very close to zero benefit. Why would you do that?

0 comments

jacobmischka9y ago

It's not silly. One of Arch's primary draws is being the first to get updates and integrate new technologies. Other distros will follow soon enough if there really aren't any others.

It's not as if python2 suddenly doesn't exist, it's not terribly life-changing to add a 2 in the places where the scripts are still on the last version.

I'm glad to be on a system where the default Python version isn't one that will be officially unsupported in three years.

Edit: It's worth pointing out that this switch was made 6 years ago and the world is still spinning.

https://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/

JeremyBanksOP9y ago

They can adopt Python 3 and drop Python 2 without adding this link which encourages a convention of /usr/bin/env python for Python 3 on their platform, creating unnecessary incompatibility with other platforms.

As you said, it's old news now, and not the end of the world. But I'm hoping others don't follow.

baq9y ago

I'm pretty sure Ubuntu 16.04 is Python 3 by default and you have to ask for 2.

edit: nope, been imagining things. too much time in venvs i guess. need to get more sleep :)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse