OK, I'll make another attempt at conveying my point, perhaps I wasn't clear enough.
I believe it's a mistake to treat words as though they were nothing more than abstract parse tokens, devoid of any cultural, historical or etymological baggage and conveying only the precise meaning that we intend to convey. Language is more complex than that, and the baggage that comes along with words does sometimes imply things that may be entirely unintended by the speaker, and often slip easily below the level of conscious awareness. Entire
fields of propaganda (and advertising!) are based on this.
I am unsure why even the idea of thinking about the words we use is apparently so controversial - is critical self-examination really so scary?