undefined | Better HN

0 pointsyummyfajitas9y ago0 comments

On the contrary, Kalanick is directly appealing to the conscience of the community. Whenever regulators attempt to shut him down he appeals directly to the public: "Bill de Blasio/Shiv Sena/Telangana Taxi Association/etc wants to take away your ride!"

Many in the civil rights movement also broke laws for their own profit or other benefit; they wanted the right to work any job they were qualified for, live in any neighborhood, etc. What's wrong with that?

Does one need to be completely altruistic to oppose injustice? Victims cannot protest, only uninterested third parties?

0 comments

vacri9y ago

That is a pretty gross rephrasing of wpietri's point.

yummyfajitasOP9y ago

I understand that my comparison is inspiring negative emotions. But that doesn't make it wrong.

Do you have an intellectual (rather than emotional) argument why my rephrasing is somehow invalid?

inimino9y ago

If you can't see why individuals fighting against systemic racism at great personal risk is an entirely different thing from a billion-dollar company flouting regulations established to protect consumers and employees, then there is little hope that an intellectual argument will make it clear to you.

vacri9y ago

You are correct that it's not the inspiring of negative emotions that makes your comparison wrong.

I do have an intellectual argument, but you're pretty clearly trolling, so there's no real point in presenting it. You're not stupid and you know what you're doing, so why prolong the pretense?

1 more reply

inimino9y ago

Self-interest is not conscience.

bogomipz9y ago

Wow you are actually attempting to connect Rosa Parks and the Civil Rights movement, "conscience" and "injustice" with Travis Kalanick and Uber?

That is so messed up.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsyummyfajitas9y ago0 comments

Does one need to be completely altruistic to oppose injustice? Victims cannot protest, only uninterested third parties?

0 comments

vacri9y ago

That is a pretty gross rephrasing of wpietri's point.

yummyfajitasOP9y ago

I understand that my comparison is inspiring negative emotions. But that doesn't make it wrong.

Do you have an intellectual (rather than emotional) argument why my rephrasing is somehow invalid?

inimino9y ago

vacri9y ago

You are correct that it's not the inspiring of negative emotions that makes your comparison wrong.

I do have an intellectual argument, but you're pretty clearly trolling, so there's no real point in presenting it. You're not stupid and you know what you're doing, so why prolong the pretense?

1 more reply

inimino9y ago

Self-interest is not conscience.

bogomipz9y ago

Wow you are actually attempting to connect Rosa Parks and the Civil Rights movement, "conscience" and "injustice" with Travis Kalanick and Uber?

That is so messed up.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse