>Could you stop using words like "vapid", "ridiculous", and "asinine"?
No. It is what it is. You don't like it because it undermines your blatant, translucent apologism.
>Developers who build on Flash can't multitask until the iPhone Flash runtime exposes the multitasking API.
The sort of apps built with Flash are unlikely to be the sort that would need to access the multitasking API. That's a specious, ridiculous example. Your example is as logical as Microsoft banning any language but C# from ASP.NET because hypothetically it will be the first to take advantage of a new IIS feature. Thankfully most people realize how damaging and absurd such an argument is.
>The developers of those applications are beholden to Adobe to get access to a core iPhone OS feature.
NO THEY ARE NOT
See, they have the choice whether to use the toolkit or not. If it doesn't stay current, and their apps aren't as saleable because they don't take advantage of the latest innovation or use the latest instruction set or yield the best performance, developers migrate away. That's how "free markets" work.
Apple completely undermined that, yet remarkable the faithful go forth to sell the pitch despite having a complete absence of empirical standing for it.
>This is not a complicated argument.
Right. It isn't.
Honestly I'm surprised I haven't been moderated to -infinity, as Hacker News is generally a clearinghouse of pro-Apple apologism. If this place is starting to get more centrist, Apple really is in trouble (PG already alluded to this a couple of essays ago)