undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbad_user9y ago0 comments

I was born in Romania under communism, which fell in December 1989.

We didn't have children living on the streets either. But the reason for that was that giving children up for adoption was essentially illegal, the women of our country being denied contraception, having a mandate to reproduce and raise offsprings. And also foster homes were essentially prisons, some in really poor conditions; at least those that had the children with special needs were absolutely horrible (i.e. the new men couldn't admit the existence of the handicapped).

So you know, the actual reason many of these countries haven't had children on the streets is because the police wouldn't allow it ;-)

And I feel compelled to mention this for those among you that might get romantic ideas about how communism happened to be in practice.

0 comments

2 comments · 2 top-level

hisham_hm9y ago

> And also foster homes were essentially prisons, some in really poor conditions

This is still true of most orphanages in countries like Brazil. It still beats dying of hunger and cold under a bridge any day, which is unfortunately still a common occurrence in those countries.

Daishiman9y ago

But this is no different than what happens in capitalist nations, which show a constellation of different policies as well. Romania was different from Yugoslavia, which was different from Cuba or Hungary.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse