undefined | Better HN

0 pointsgrzm9y ago0 comments

It's not necessary for a subsequent vote to have the same outcome as the first. The issue is whether the election is secure and people have trust in the system.

0 comments

caf9y ago

Indeed, here is a recent example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Senate_special_elec...

lisivka9y ago

So first goal of fakers is to ruin that. It even written as one of main goals in Russian trolls goal books. Find a copy of such book and read it: you will learn a lot.

grzmOP9y ago

Once there's no longer trust in the system, you're right, secure voting is no longer a problem.

Which is why it's important to fix this earlier rather than later.

If it's your goal to cast more FUD on the issue, that's your choice. I can't even ask to you be honest about it because that wouldn't be congruent with spreading FUD.

lisivka9y ago

Just trust your leaders and FUD will not work.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

caf9y ago

Indeed, here is a recent example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Senate_special_elec...

lisivka9y ago

So first goal of fakers is to ruin that. It even written as one of main goals in Russian trolls goal books. Find a copy of such book and read it: you will learn a lot.

grzmOP9y ago

Once there's no longer trust in the system, you're right, secure voting is no longer a problem.

Which is why it's important to fix this earlier rather than later.

If it's your goal to cast more FUD on the issue, that's your choice. I can't even ask to you be honest about it because that wouldn't be congruent with spreading FUD.

lisivka9y ago

Just trust your leaders and FUD will not work.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse