This falls under not repairing enough of the damage. If the view is that delaying Alzheimer's to let people die from heart disease a couple of years later is great, well, that's a problem. It isn't great. It isn't sufficient. It is taking an entirely too narrow a focus. It is deliberate aim at a worse outcome rather than a better outcome. Cures, not postponement, across the board must be the strategic goal - it is a shirking of responsibilities to shrug and say it is good enough to push off a disease for the year or two that would reduce its mortality rate if all other conditions kept happening at the same level as today, rather than aiming higher.