Me too. My "Source?" question is still standing.
Computer programmers and geeky types are not representative of the general population.
That's not the people I referred to when talking of who knows about ESA.
>They should refuse to do anything that was against (or far from what was in) their program. Leaflets hardly reflect all of a candidate's program. Maybe they should though? Why allow for non approved/requested by the public policy changes that they come up on their own?
Leaflets are small pieces of information that are supposed to be simple and direct. Do you expect details on NASA funding in an A5 piece of papers that barely contains a face and a slogan (and perhaps a few phone numbers and a Twitter handle)?
Even better, ask in a direct democratic way for anything not in the program (yeah, within reason -- they could do trivial things and directing).
Ask any political scientist why this is not a good idea.