Is it to satisfy your hunger in the afternoon of midday as a snack? If so why not just buy granola or protein bars that at least have some flavor?
As for other bars, I suspect you will find that most energy bars are not healthy at all. Granola bars are mostly sugar/carbs. The only bar that I know that competes with Soylent in terms of being low-carb, high-fiber, high-protein is Quest. Like Soylent, they use isomalto-oligosaccharides (a whole lot of fiber), just more of it. Quest uses mostly natural sweeteners such as stevia and erythritol, though some contain sucralose. The average Quest bar (60g) has just around 5g carbohydrates.
Why?
A useful summary:
- Some people have gotten sick. There is no indication as to why or how. Likely possibilities include:
- circumstantial/no causation
- contamination of the batch (biological or chemical)
- allergic reaction to an ingredient (happening 'now' could be a result of accumulation)
- This was all from the same batch (per current evidence)- This batch has been recalled and they are trying to figure out what went wrong. (the thing we expect any food manufacturer to do when something like this happens)
I expect Soylent is an interesting exercise in people finding out they have allergies they did not know about, but I am going to wait and see before I hunting for spare pitchforks.
Bit frustrating for those people when one of the selling points from the kickstarter was
> > "For anyone that struggles with allergies, heartburn, acid reflux or digestion, has trouble controlling weight or cholesterol, or simply doesn't have the means to eat well, soylent is for you."
So what does a huge food company do when it releases a new product?
Say Quaker Oats rolled out a flavorless Granola Bar, do they just expect a certain number of ER visits?
They also list whether the production line is shared with other products that might contain allergens.
This is pretty important, since food allergies can kill. (Not many, only about 150 - 200 per year die form peanut allergies in the US.)
There's no recall for a Soylent product listed on the FDA's recall page.[2] So this hasn't been properly recalled.
[1] https://www.foodsafety.gov/report/problem/index.html [2] http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/default.htm
Problem is, many of those quantities (specially vitamins) are a wild guess to medical science. If you go check the literature about certain minerals/vitamins you should consume, the values vary a lot, the effects on the organism from too much or too little aren't well understood, and worst, you can't be sure you are actually ingesting all the necessary types of vitamins/minerals/??? you need to have a healthy life... there are still too many unknowns.
I did that for about 3-4 months (every other weekend I would go to my parents home and had "real" food), and in the beginning I felt good, but after about 2.5-3 months I didn't feel so good anymore.
TL;DR: I really think that something like Soylent (this one, not the one from the novel) will be the future for a good part of mankind, but that will happen a long time from now when medical science and biology advance quite a bit.
That seems a bit reactionary. A large number of the bars will have the same expiration date even if they were produced in different batches or facilities.
This whole piece seems to be designed to stir up emotions rather than provide real analysis. It is fine to express concern when people are getting sick, but this seems more like a attack. The default assumption seems to be that the Soylent team is hiding something, which does not seem consistent with Rosa Labs' previous disclosures about production issues.
Anyway I have been eating bars from a box with the same labeling (B1-00CAR BEST BY 1966 14JUL17 0716) for weeks with no ill effects. Rather than throwing all their product away if someone is worried they can try consuming a small portion of a bar first and then wait to see if there are any ill effects.
Lol, did they just admitted 135 PC - Destroying or Concealing Evidence ? ;)