I agree, I too only read the first part to get a 'flavor' for the discussion and the viewpoints of those in it.

The speakers are trying to convey too much nuanced information at once for each point, and the text is presented in a small annoyingly dense format.

More editorial structure to make it easy to scan for the main points, and read through their related details as necessary would be required for me to have an interest in ingesting the content.

That isn't to say 'make it bite sized', that's saying "Give it structure, organization, and consolidate like things together".