An interesting concept. Every project I looked at listed significant problems. My impression was not 'this is how it Aisler works'. Unfortunately, my impression was, 'this does not seem to work.'
My advice at this early stage: prune the available projects to only those having high quality in terms of straight forward implementation. Show me how it is supposed to work, instead of just bulk listing projects with variable quality.
To put it another way, do the hard work of curating the projects to those that will provide a good user experience. That means showing people looking for projects only those without issues. That means, at this stage, increasing the number of projects by fixing all the issues before listing them. That's also hard work. If it isn't worth doing for the project owners, then a model that expects visitors to invest time 'fixing the website' is likely to struggle. First people have to care.
Good luck.
