Indeed. In fact given the extremely specific and unusual fact pattern and mention of jurisdiction, that post itself might well end up used to launch an appeal.

It says right there that they could raise objections before the expert or jury heard the question. If the question were unfair or misleading I'm sure they would.

If you think that there aren't several confident know-it-all types who never get cross-examined on every jury everywhere ever, you wouldn't make a very good defense attorney.

The job of the jury is to determine the credibility of both the evidence and the witnesses. The idea that this somehow morphed me into a shadow expert witness is a very uncharitable reading.