The current state is that we have evidence that the current theories are not correct which leaves a gap for new theories to fill.
Sounds like an exciting area to be working in right now if you ask me (unfortunately, I'm not!).
This is "nightmare scenario" because we knew that the theories aren't correct, but we hoped for some results that would guide and inspire new theories. Either way we know that we aren't done yet, but the current state is like being in a featureless void, unable to know where to direct one's efforts.
Or so I have heard.
(I'm not a physicist), but is it possible to almost automate some of the discovery process to attempt to turn up new leads? (or is the search-space too large for this to be reasonable?).
Special relativity and quantum mechanics were joined by Dirac in 1928 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation
General relativity is apparently more difficult, and we don't have a quantum version yet.
The case of no new physics "just" mean that they'll have to start looking else where. Their job just got a little harder, and while I can appreciate how annoying that can be, it's hardly a nightmare.
edit: LHC webcams, interesting: http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html
What other alternatives are there?
Also, i wonder , now that LHC has become "boring" , what options are there for repurposing it?
http://backreaction.blogspot.com.au/2016/07/why-lhc-is-such-...