Microsoft would benefit if they could do all of these anti-consumer things, but that recent stampede towards Linux proved that the tennantry can be easily spooked and dangerous when on the move. Developers are leaving windows to work on Linux and Mac, to the extent that I have not seen a start menu on a single laptop in the entire CS department. If, at some point in the future we all ended up locked in to .net, I would be surprised if Microsoft's management continued their support of these charitable projects.
In that light, I think it would be wise for us to avoid getting locked back in - so that Windows might continue moving towards being a nice place to work.
Actually, most, if not all of the provisions, of the DOJ settlement have expired. This is why they can ship an AV with their OS and tell OEM's to cut it out with the crapware and offer special installers to remove this stuff.
I think they're just too weak to be the MS of the 90s. They just have to play ball to be competitive like everyone else. This is a good thing. Yet somehow the hysterical anti-MS attitudes are still here. Look at this thread. Its 90% conspiracy theories and axe grinding from things a decade out.
To argue that the same business practices from the 90s apply today, especially in the technology sector where the entire plane shifts radically every other year... that's just crazy. I don't see why so many people buy into it still.
There are 2/64 comments expressing this view. You're being hyperbolic. The main theme recently has been "Wow, I never thought I would like MS again, but they're impressing me!"
If anything, MS is the new darling brand of the big five here.
To be fair, M$ earned this.
Reputation is everything.
Getting everyone into the system is infinitively expensive, so is getting everyone out of it.
While there are some costs to switching away from an OS/ecosystem, there's a limit to them, and it's often low enough to be economical for a business to switch or to allow some of its employees to switch (I've seen this with development shops that switch from Windows to mostly Linux with a little OS X).
By comparison to what Microsoft went through in the late 1990s, today is a cakewalk, they have drastically more freedom and less of a spotlight on their behavior. Nobody really cares about Windows now, nobody fears Microsoft like they did in 1998, nobody thinks Bill Gates is Satan incarnate, nobody is calling for Microsoft to be broken into pieces.
point blank most families these days have 3 or 4 iOS or Android computing devices for every 1 windows computing device.
Really, that lawsuit not enough to convince you it's a big deal? They're "upgrading" users without their consent/knowledge using ui dark patterns.
At least be honest if you work for Microsoft.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish
I can't seem to find anything on how UE4 is licensed, but even if Microsoft is forced to release all of their source code, if their fork is different enough from the main-branch, it might be extremely hard to backport all of these features into the main-branch.
[0]:http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2012/07/steams-newell-windows-... [1]:http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/03/tim-sweeney-to-microso...
http://www.pcgamer.com/tim-sweeney-thinks-microsoft-will-mak...
"If you see a 404 page, you need to complete the enrollment process: Create a GitHub account.
Sign up for the Epic program
Follow the instructions to associate your Epic Program account with your GitHub account.
Join the Epic GitHub Org (from the email invitation you receive after Step 3)"
You can test it by logging out of our account and attempting to access a private repo url you usually can access.
This kind of confusion is part of the problem.
https://github.com/ReactWindows/react-native-windows
Cool stuff.