undefined | Better HN

0 pointskasey_junk9y ago0 comments

Exchanges do time ordered processing on their own exchange (with different levels of precision). I don't know of any exchanges that offer execution time as a constraint, but new order types can be created if they were deemed valuable (it takes SEC approval).

That said, it wouldn't alleviate the issue necessarily. If firms detect problems in the clock sync between exchanges you are right back to the same problem, and now you've added a complex bit of tech that requires a bunch of competitors to agree on.

This seems, to me at least, to be one of those problems that it is better to let the problem surface than to try to alleviate with an abstraction layer that is leaky and error prone.

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

lsaferite9y ago

But this technology is patent is just implementing the exact same thing at one layer removed from the exchange. You still have to time the orders and you still have to keep the timed orders confidential. To me, using a 3rd party to do this instead of having it as part of the base system is... silly I guess.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse