You'd think, but I'd wager the offence that they do write up is driving with a broken tail light, which is apparently a capital offence.
It'd be nice to imagine that they'd look into the illegal search they carried out, but rather, they'll likely fixate on how he was actually definitely guilty of a crime and this was absolutely justified.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-p-sherouse/the-problem-wi...