Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/...
There is no possible way she has the authority on her own, or the State Department by itself, to allow her kitchen cabinet blow the covers of these people and methods, she in fact had a duty to report such breaches.
That puts my mind at ease.
One is about operating a private email server and using it for official business that occasionally included sensitive information that shouldn't be held on internet connected computers.
The other is removing classified information from secure systems (I think it's implying SIPRNET) and keeping copies of them in your home.
One case is a person not saying "hey guys, we shouldn't talk about this here" when topics get sensitive and the other is a deliberate copying of classified information.
One constitutes careless handling of sensitive information, one constitutes intentional mishandling of classified information.