Not as I read it. In the article, "psychotic break" was used in the context of being caused by meditation instead of by an underlying mental illness.

The second example gets closer to addressing the point I was making, but it's still just listing a possible risk for people who already have psychiatric problems.

What I wanted the article to cover is the far more likely explanation: That 1 in 4 people who meditate will experience some level of mental illness in any given year — but not because of meditation.

Of course, "meditation madness" is a much sexier premise.