> 4. Switch to a user-based pricing to generate more revenue for investors

You add "for investors" as a slur, like it's a bad thing. Every company, public or private, has investors -- even if it's just the founders.

> but spin it as a freebie "Hey! Look at the cool unlimited shit! No, no! Don't pay attention to the fact you're gonna be charged 3 times as much as before for the same service".

Except not everyone will be charged 3x as much. Many will be charged much less. It totally depends on the setup.

I have heard countless times over the years what a pain it is for orgs to be charged per repo. It incentives monolithic repos.

Equally important: from the perspective of a company trying to maintain budgets, it might actually make more sense to _them_. Factoring Github as a per-head charge, similar to everything from Slack/Gmail/Photoshop to laptops to food and other perks to healthcare benefits, might make things easier than worrying about whether your employees are structuring their repos in a way that minimizes costs.