> Also, that blog post is terrible, and highlights why the FSF fails so miserably at it's mission. Referring to Windows as "freedom-denying, user-controlling, surveillance system" ignores the fact that most people don't care because it works.
These users do not value freedom. And that's their right, however much we disagree with it.
It doesn't make those statements false, and doesn't change the situation. I wrote that article to focus on software freedom, its purpose, and GNU.
We don't ignore the fact that "most people don't care because it works"; that doesn't make sense, because that works against our ideals.
