undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbryanrasmussen9y ago0 comments

well the thing is - Microsoft isn't a person, it's a company - as a general rule it is reasonable to assume that companies don't do anything out of the goodness of their hearts, when you also have a good deal of bad behavior in the past ( and 20 years ago can be the recent past for a company) it might make sense to keep an increase sense of skepticism.

0 comments

ocdtrekkie9y ago

Twenty years ago isn't "recent history" for anything in the tech industry. People who were at Microsoft back when they were "really evil" in the 90s have since WORKED AT GOOGLE (or any number of other companies you might be a fan of), and even left Google, since then.

Very few people who made decisions you may be holding over them today, actually work at Microsoft today. You can legitimately hold a decision against a person for a long time... they're still the same person, more than likely. But a company is an amalgamation of it's employees. And employees come and go.

sametmax9y ago

In companies, this is not as important as the general policy and vision of the group. The entity is an autonomous system greater than its parts.

bryanrasmussenOP9y ago

I'm not a fan of any company. But a company is an amalgamation of its employees, and employees when they come in absorb the company culture ( that's why everyone says the culture is important) and that's why you don't change the company culture unless a significant number of high level employees all leave at once.

and my second point is - Steve Ballmer left in 2014.

ohnomrbill9y ago

That's exactly my point. With people, assume they can change for the better; with companies, judge them primarily by their bad actions.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse