// voodoo magic from stackoverflow starts here (link: ...)But, of course, that's very unlikely to happen.
Just like how the US economy works.
Yes, it is a bit of a smug joke, and a bit of self-deprecatory humor as well. Since plenty of people leverage the expertise of folks on stack overflow and are still effective devs in their own right. But it feels like you would be shocked by the notion that a significant number of professional developers would struggle with, say, the fizzbuzz problem. But everything I've ever seen indicates that there is a huge class of developers who earn decent wages doing coding for a living at lots of places who nevertheless struggle with coding at a basic level.
Unless there is some type of reference, you have no idea of what is going on or why...
Does anybody know how to make a Sublime Text plugin? Oh wait, I know where to look that up.
I disagree. If you knowingly publish your code on such sites, then you know ahead of time that the license is CC. Others are abiding well within their rights as licensees if they use your published code as such.
It's only unethical if CodeReview did not clearly and plainly disclose their licensing agreement a priori, or if, as a licensee, you violated the terms of that license.