>
must it be demonstrated that there is some specific malicious intent...I think so. Just the act of changing User-Agent alone does not mean a fraud is happening. User-Agents get changed often for valid reasons - research, detection of cloaking, testing etc.
> However if the full article is included in the response and I read it by simply viewing the response body (HTML) is that circumventing security?
That is a hard issue. I think the answer should be no, it is not circumvention, at least not in the above sense.(\) If you can get full article on your computer, directly readable without fraudulent behaviour on your part, this means that the sender did not place a security measure to guard it, so there can be no circumventing it. Switching javascript off or displaying source text of the document is fully in the control of the requestor and the sender should know it.
(\) Unfortunately, it seems legal systems allow companies to restrict what you do with things they produce, even if you do it on your computer in private, so legally, this may not be successful in court.