What happens when you have competition with
10x or 50x the VC funding?
Money doesn't solve all problems. I've been in a startup that raised $250M and one that raised $55M where all innovation had stalled. Don't assume they're kicking ass because they're rich. There are plenty of professional money burners out there. But if you're faced with a competitor that has their act together (I am and they've raised 360 times what I have) you need to differentiate and move quickly. You'd be surprised the constraints that some startups operate under e.g. boards who want them to be something that you're not even if what you're doing is clearly more lucrative. Or legacy (even in startups) customers they brought on free where it would be akward or embarrasing to explain to them why they're now doing what you're doing in the way you're doing it. What happens to long-term product development when all
you do is short term / small-scale improvements in order to
'better serve' your customers?
Don't do that. Always play the long game. What happens to your core IP advantage that may be several
years now but will have disappeared after doing long
stretches of "feature" developments to chase after customers?
I have no idea what you're talking about. Sounds like you've misinterpreted 'serving customers' as some kind of short sighted feature focused strategy?