undefined | Better HN

0 pointsacdha10y ago0 comments

That's effectively telling everyone that if they aren't comfortable a) researching the available programs, b) paying for a server to host it, and c) learning enough to support a running container, manage SSL certificates, install security updates promptly, they shouldn't be part of the community. That's bad for growing the community, particularly since there are many people who participate in OSS now who don't have all of those skills or the time to spend supporting a service even if they do.

0 comments

5 comments · 2 top-level

davidw10y ago· 2 in thread

Exactly 0 of those things are required to interact on IRC.

Source: have been using IRC since late 1993.

acdhaOP10y ago

> Exactly 0 of those things are required to interact on IRC.

This entire thread has been about whether IRC can offer a competitive experience to services like Slack, Gitter, etc. I don't think anyone is arguing that you cannot use IRC at all without tools but even you were just saying (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11013780) that you need the money and skills to run a server to have a first-class experience.

> Source: have been using IRC since late 1993.

Ditto but the world has moved on quite a lot since then and many of us think that IRC needs to as well or it will continue declining into obscurity.

davidw10y ago

My points are not about the tech so much as:

* Proprietary protocols are generally a bad deal, and especially so for open source projects. Proprietary clients (gmail, for instance) don't matter as much unless you are RMS.

* Chat should not be a central component of an open source project, but an 'extra' for occasional real time communications. If important stuff happens there, it will alienate people who can't participate because of time zones or other reasons.

Someone else wrote the comment you linked.

1 more reply

LaSombra10y ago· 1 in thread

And the price for convenience is, eventually, hassle migrating to a different service every time something doesn't work to your liking. Need to pay Slack for features? Jump another hoop. What for?

Microsoft has made billions locking people up in the name of convenience.

You can have these things if you care or you can use its simplest form. Don't want to use a bouncer? Use a web client.

People keep repeating OSS. But now OSS is more about having being recognized than really believing in it. Using closed source software is one point.

I'm no radical, I use a Mac and I shed a tear every time I have to use Lightroom because I haven't find the drive to move to Darktable or Sublime instead of Atom.

acdhaOP10y ago

I've been using free software for a couple decades. I get why it's valuable but having watched what is and is not adopted really underscores if we want people to use OSS we need to offer a competitive experience. Years of cajoling people did not get them to use Linux because the desktop experience sucked. Years of advocacy did not get them to adopt Mozilla in great numbers but people did respond when Phoenix/Firefox focused on UX and was actively improving during Internet Explorer's great stagnation.

Anyone who wants to avoid the possibility of lock-in using Slack should be laser-focused on making IRC competitive rather than trying to convince people that poor UX is just the price of freedom.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

5 comments · 2 top-level

davidw10y ago· 2 in thread

Exactly 0 of those things are required to interact on IRC.

Source: have been using IRC since late 1993.

acdhaOP10y ago

> Exactly 0 of those things are required to interact on IRC.

> Source: have been using IRC since late 1993.

Ditto but the world has moved on quite a lot since then and many of us think that IRC needs to as well or it will continue declining into obscurity.

davidw10y ago

My points are not about the tech so much as:

* Proprietary protocols are generally a bad deal, and especially so for open source projects. Proprietary clients (gmail, for instance) don't matter as much unless you are RMS.

Someone else wrote the comment you linked.

1 more reply

LaSombra10y ago· 1 in thread

And the price for convenience is, eventually, hassle migrating to a different service every time something doesn't work to your liking. Need to pay Slack for features? Jump another hoop. What for?

Microsoft has made billions locking people up in the name of convenience.

You can have these things if you care or you can use its simplest form. Don't want to use a bouncer? Use a web client.

People keep repeating OSS. But now OSS is more about having being recognized than really believing in it. Using closed source software is one point.

I'm no radical, I use a Mac and I shed a tear every time I have to use Lightroom because I haven't find the drive to move to Darktable or Sublime instead of Atom.

acdhaOP10y ago

Anyone who wants to avoid the possibility of lock-in using Slack should be laser-focused on making IRC competitive rather than trying to convince people that poor UX is just the price of freedom.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse