I think this is an oversimplifying view of reality.
Taking the most extreme case (free everything) and pointing out it's impossible (without referencing a single data point of evidence no less) is pointless.
Basic income is not about people not having to work for a living, it's a proposed restructuring of the social security that many nation states already have in place. That is, a simple basic income formula replacing complex and hard/expensive to police support formulas for the sick, elderly and/or unemployed. One of the leading arguments for these experiments is how they allow governments to downsize their workforce, thus lowering the cost for the taxpaying segment society.
As far as I know, early real world experiments are just now being spun up (in the Netherlands and Finland, for example), and so far all we have is simulation and theories from economists. That's not enough data to rule out the entire model.
You are of course welcome to have your own opinion and gut feeling about the matter, but until someone proves your point, I remain unconvinced.