undefined | Better HN

0 pointsocdtrekkie10y ago0 comments

Not any sort of name, but an article on Sundar specifically cited that it was one of his early moves after taking over Android. I can dig up the source if you want it, but there's not a lot of additional info there, unfortunately.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

ocdtrekkieOP10y ago· 2 in thread

http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014-06-24/googles-sund...

"And Pichai killed a project to develop a version of Android for touchscreen laptops—it overlapped with Chromebooks—shifting attention toward tablets and new categories such as smart TVs and wearable computers."

bobajeff10y ago

Thanks. The reasoning wasn't terribly sound. (Android and Chrome OS overlap regardless of the target hardware).

But from a branding perspective it makes sense to distance a immature product from a widely popular product. (Obviously that wasn't the idea though since Android Auto, Android TV, Android Wear)

I can also see why they wouldn't want to kill off Chrome OS since it allows them to experiment with a diverging set of strengths and features that Android might not be conducive toward. Those strengths could be leveraged in their other products especially Android.

ocdtrekkieOP10y ago

The biggest problem, IMHO, is that Windows is now leading the charge for a converged OS. Ubuntu is talking it too. OS X and iOS are getting better interconnected in recent versions. Chrome OS's Android app port thing kinda indicates Google knows it's the future.

Soon it's going to be an expectation that your apps are available on someone's desktop and their phone. Google shot themselves in the foot here.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse