undefined | Better HN

0 pointscushychicken10y ago0 comments

>it's a big deal if a bunch of academics are spending time working on the wrong things

At the risk of sounding a little prickly with my comment - isn't it a little presumptuous to write off a certain amount of research as "wrong"? There are plenty of examples of research that didn't have a clear purpose leading to breakthroughs - safety glass, microwave ovens, and Teflon all spring to mind.

Also, focusing on efficiency doesn't really align with academia's purpose, which (to my mind) has more to do with fundamental research. This article about Xerox PARC springs to mind:

http://www.fastcodesign.com/3046437/5-steps-to-recreate-xero...

0 comments

11 comments · 3 top-level

mdwelsh10y ago· 5 in thread

That's a fair point. I'm trying to draw a distinction between "speculative" research (which might pan out long term) and "industry-focused" research (which tries to solve problems we have today). My concern is not with speculative research -- that's great -- but rather flawed industry-focused research: making incorrect assumptions, failing to deal with the general case, not considering real-world constraints.

gradstudent10y ago

> but rather flawed industry-focused research: making incorrect assumptions, failing to deal with the general case, not considering real-world constraints.

I find this point rather condescending. What you term "incorrect assumptions" are often necessary simplifications that reveal the core of the problem at hand. The point is to try and understand what makes problems hard and to develop new ways of solving them; not to deliver to companies like Google ready-made solutions that cater to their every operational need. Don't like that? Too bad. Fund your own research.

mdwelsh10y ago

No, I mean incorrect assumptions. It doesn't matter if we're talking research in industry or academia; doing research based on flawed (not simplifying) assumptions is bad science.

1 more reply

s986s10y ago

Honestly, if the academics didnt choose their research the private industry wouldnt have to hire r and d. This sounds more of a ploy to save costs by having academics build for the industry on government money than to hire people to further a companies interests.

incepted10y ago

> making incorrect assumptions

If it was easy to know when you make incorrect assumptions, nobody would.

mdwelsh10y ago

Well, the whole point of my post is to give some tips on how not to.

kevan10y ago· 2 in thread

I understood that as more of a lament that a lot of work is being duplicated because academics aren't aware of prior work in the industry. But then again, how are you supposed to know that someone has a solution unless they tell the world about it in a publication?

> It drives me insane to see papers that claim that some problem is "unsolved" when most of the industry players have already solved it, but they didn't happen to write an NSDI or SIGCOMM paper about it.

sanderjd10y ago

There are more ways to "publish" work than in academic publications. I'm not sure to what extent it is unrealistic to expect academics to be keeping up with what is going on at industry conferences or on github or by talking to people at user groups or wherever, but the reality will always be that academic publications are not the only, or the most up-to-date, source of information.

kevan10y ago

Agreed, blog posts and open source projects can be just as helpful as journal-published articles. I didn't intend publications to mean only academic journals.

2 more replies

knughit10y ago· 1 in thread

Matt is talking about academic who publish papers showing that System X is Y% better than System Z, under completely nonsensical conditions. They aren't advancing the state of the art, they are mapping the terrain of the compost heap, but don't realize it.

mcguire10y ago

Is he? Maybe he should have said that.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

11 comments · 3 top-level

mdwelsh10y ago· 5 in thread

gradstudent10y ago

> but rather flawed industry-focused research: making incorrect assumptions, failing to deal with the general case, not considering real-world constraints.

mdwelsh10y ago

No, I mean incorrect assumptions. It doesn't matter if we're talking research in industry or academia; doing research based on flawed (not simplifying) assumptions is bad science.

1 more reply

s986s10y ago

incepted10y ago

> making incorrect assumptions

If it was easy to know when you make incorrect assumptions, nobody would.

mdwelsh10y ago

Well, the whole point of my post is to give some tips on how not to.

kevan10y ago· 2 in thread

sanderjd10y ago

kevan10y ago

Agreed, blog posts and open source projects can be just as helpful as journal-published articles. I didn't intend publications to mean only academic journals.

2 more replies

knughit10y ago· 1 in thread

mcguire10y ago

Is he? Maybe he should have said that.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse